This terracotta figurine appears almost appears utilitarian. Lacking legs all together, her torso emerges from a wide, cylindrical base that bends at the hips and tappers inwards towards her waist. She holds her arms down in front of her with her hands held open palm upwards in a gesture of receiving. Her breasts are well accentuated. Jewelry adorns her body, including a necklace with a large circural central pendant and a pair of dangling earrings. The bridge of her nose is quite prominent, curving into her brow that frames her coffee bean eyes. Her hair has been styled into three buns that top her head, or she may wear a headdress or crown.The Indus Civilization is still enigmatic: an ancient civilization with a yet-to be deciphered writing system, a mysterious monumental architecture, no monumental art, a puzzling decline, and little evidence of the identity of its direct descendants. In a civilization extending over an area so vast, one would expect to find monumental art and/or architectural symbols of power displaying the names of the powerful. Instead, the emphasis is placed on small, elegant art and sophisticated craft technology.Three-dimensional representations of living beings in the Harappan world are confined to a few stone and bronze statues and some small objects crafted in faience, stone, and other materials - with one important exception. Ranging variously in size, the anthropomorphic and animal terracotta figurines the Indus Civilization sites depict life as seen by the Harappan people in the Bronze Age. Terracotta figurines have long been considered toys, often without question. The earliest anthropomorphic figurines from Harappa date back to the Early Harappan (Ravi Phase, Period 1, and Kot Diji Phase, Period 2) levels. Among these are stylized seated female figurines with exaggerated buttocks and thighs and joined legs extended in front.However, large terracotta figurines thrown on the wheel such as this one, mostly seem to have come from the valley of Bajaur in Pakistan, where a distinctive style of semi-realistic anthropomorphic figurines was allegedly produced during the early 3rd millennium BCE. Incredibly enough, the extraordinary blend of realism -imbued in the detailed torso and arms of this figurine, and surrealism -of her large almost zoomorphic facial traits- would not feel out of place in a contemporary setting, thus transcending the boundaries of time and space. This figure appears to recall some of the earliest neolithic fertility idols, to whom she is most likely related. Surely, she exudes an energy befitting such an ancient goddess.- (LO.594)

Antiquities
Ancient Near East